1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 303 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
Model | Tickford | XK |
Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 541 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2590 mm |