1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 474 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Isuzu |
Model | Tickford | KB |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3060 mm |