1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 401 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Tickford | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2261 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
