1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
| Model | Tickford | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 317 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |
