1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 20 kg more than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | Rogue |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4656 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2690 mm |