1954 Austin Princess vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1954 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin Princess. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin Princess. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1954 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin Princess | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Princess | Calais |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |