1954 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Bentley R Type Continental | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
| Make | Bentley | BMW |
| Model | R Type Continental | Z9 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4566 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2960 mm |
