1954 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Bentley R Type Continental | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Bentley | Volkswagen |
| Model | R Type Continental | Polo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4887 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 45 L |
