1954 BMW 340 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1954 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 470 kg more than 1954 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 BMW 340 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 340 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3270 mm |
