1954 BMW 340 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1954 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1954 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 325 kg more than 1954 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 BMW 340 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | 340 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2845 mm |
