1954 BMW 501 vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1954 BMW 501.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 BMW 501 | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 501 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |
