1954 BMW 501 vs. 2010 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2010 Toyota Aygo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 BMW 501 weights approximately 420 kg more than 2010 Toyota Aygo.
Because 1954 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 BMW 501 | 2010 Toyota Aygo | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 501 | Aygo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3405 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1615 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2340 mm |
