1954 Bristol 403 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1954 Bristol 403. (86 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Bristol 403 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1954 Bristol 403 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Bristol 403. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Bristol 403. (146 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Bristol 403.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Bristol 403 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 403 | 3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2650 mm |