1954 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,256 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Bugatti Type 101 (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Bugatti Type 101 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Bugatti Type 101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Bugatti Type 101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Bugatti Type 101 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Bugatti | Ford |
Model | Type 101 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3256 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1110 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2540 mm |