1954 Buick 40 vs. 1957 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1957 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 1957 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4328 cc | 5424 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 2004 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3290 mm |
