1954 Buick 40 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1954 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1210 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2540 mm |