1954 Buick 40 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | 62 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2070 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3300 mm |