1954 Buick 40 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4328 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3300 mm |
