1954 Buick 40 vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1966 Volvo 144 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | 40 | 144 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2620 mm |
