1954 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 109 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1954 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 6286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 422 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2800 mm |