1954 Buick 40 vs. 1970 Rover P5B
To start off, 1970 Rover P5B is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1970 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1970 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1970 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Rover P5B. (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 1970 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | 40 | P5B |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 5279 cc | 3527 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2820 mm |
