1954 Buick 40 vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1975 Triumph 2000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | 40 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |