1954 Buick 40 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1980 Volvo 265.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | 265 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1420 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2660 mm |