1954 Buick 40 vs. 1982 Lancia Prisma
To start off, 1982 Lancia Prisma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Prisma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1982 Lancia Prisma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Prisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1982 Lancia Prisma | |
Make | Buick | Lancia |
Model | 40 | Prisma |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 63.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 940 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2480 mm |