1954 Buick 40 vs. 1985 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1985 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1985 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1985 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1185 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2560 mm |