1954 Buick 40 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1410 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3030 mm |
