1954 Buick 40 vs. 1990 Isuzu Stylus
To start off, 1990 Isuzu Stylus is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1990 Isuzu Stylus. (125 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1990 Isuzu Stylus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 646 kg more than 1990 Isuzu Stylus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Stylus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1990 Isuzu Stylus | |
Make | Buick | Isuzu |
Model | 40 | Stylus |
Year Released | 1954 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1074 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2460 mm |