1954 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Renault Megane

To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (113 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: