1954 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 422 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2580 mm |