1954 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 146 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Buick | Mercury |
Model | 40 | Sable |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 248 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1574 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2760 mm |