1954 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Renault P55
To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault P55. (260 Nm). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault P55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 2000 Renault P55 | |
| Make | Buick | Renault |
| Model | 40 | P55 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4328 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2480 mm |
