1954 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2001 Mahindra CL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 420 kg more than 2001 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2001 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Buick | Mahindra |
Model | 40 | CL |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2040 mm |