1954 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2001 Mazda B2500 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 2001 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2990 mm |
