1954 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 445 kg more than 2001 Rover 75.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | 40 | 75 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1230 kg |