1954 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Equus is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Equus (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 315 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hyundai Equus (380 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Hyundai Equus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2002 Hyundai Equus | |
Make | Buick | Hyundai |
Model | 40 | Equus |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3090 mm |