1954 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 795 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: