1954 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 615 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (170 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1060 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2370 mm |