1954 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (141 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (280 Nm). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | 40 | Megane |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 309 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2680 mm |