1954 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 605 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3510 mm |