1954 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Ford F-150
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 643 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (495 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2005 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2363 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3370 mm |