1954 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 12 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 40 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Buick | Lincoln |
| Model | 40 | LS |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 232 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1687 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3020 mm |
