1954 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 271 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (325 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 382 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1946 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2710 mm |