1954 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | STS-V |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 440 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 584 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2960 mm |