1954 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Buick 40 2006 Ford Ranger
Make Buick Ford
Model 40 Ranger
Year Released 1954 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5279 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 193 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4100 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 410 Nm 257 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 19.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1720 kg 1715 kg
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2990 mm