1954 Buick 40 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2880 mm |