1954 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | C70 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |