1954 Buick 40 vs. 2010 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2010 GMC Sierra is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Sierra (315 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 643 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Sierra (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2010 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Buick | GMC |
Model | 40 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 2318 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2032 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3645 mm |