1954 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 291 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: