1954 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Highlander. (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Highlander.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2789 mm |