1954 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (148 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Buick | Aston Martin |
Model | 40 | Cygnet |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |